|
East of Scotland Branch Meeting, Tuesday 7 February 2006, Napier
University
Host: Ron Masson, Subject Group Leader, School of Management.
Subject: Presentation of final year dissertations by Graduate Quality
Students
The meeting took the form of three presentations by graduate members
of the Napier quality course. The idea of the evening was to give
young quality students an idea of what TQM and IQA were all about
and hopefully get some new members.
The audience was made up of branch members and fellow classmates
of the graduates. The judges were branch members Brian Murray, Educational
Correspondent, Jenny Glover, Committee Member and Mr. Ron Masson.
The Branch had obtained book tokens to the value of £150 for
prizes. The students were allowed approximately 15-20 minutes for
their presentations which were PowerPoint format.
“ISO14001 in Scotland; Motives, Implementation and
Benefits.”
The first speaker was Kenny Clarke whose topic was: “ISO14001
in Scotland; Motives, Implementation and Benefits.” He commenced
with a brief history of ISO14001 and indicated that the UK had 5500
certificates for same issued which was second only to Japan with
134166 certificates. His research aims were the motivation and implementation
factors, the benefits gained by organizations via ISO14401 certification
and comparisons with other studies conducted in other countries.
His research method was a postal survey to 130 BSI certified companies
in Scotland which gave a 43% response rate. The respondents were
43% manufacturing, 25% service, 11% construction, 11% recycling
and others. Implementation took up to 11months for 28%. A further
67% of companies took 12-23 months for implementation with the remaining
5% taking 24-35 months.
The important resulting benefits were environmental improvements,
improved corporate image, improved relations with authorities and
reduced waste. The important motives reported by the organizations
in obtaining ISO 14001 certification were environmental improvements,
improved corporate image, customer pressure and corporate directive.
The two top implementation factors which took the most effort were:
awareness of regulatory requirements and identifying aspects and
impacts of the standard.
Comparisons with similar surveys in Sweden and the Far East showed
similar results with high levels of effort being required for identification
of aspects, training and documentation. The conclusions were that
ISO14001 does provide business value benefits. Recommendations for
further research included benefits to the environment and the nature
of the customer voice.
“Evaluation of EFQM Model in Fife Council”
The next speaker was Morag Boyter from Fife Council
whose topic was “Evaluation of EFQM Model in Fife Council”.
The main thrust behind the EFQM Public Sector Model came from the
EC directives on Tendering and the required awareness of “Best
Value”. Her research aims were to: investigate how embedded
the EFQM model is within the performance and planning culture of
Fife Council; identify the strengths and weaknesses of the self-awareness
framework used within Fife Council and investigate the long term
benefits of the model as Fife Council have been using EFQM for over
five years. Her special area of interest was the Housing Function.
The reasons for adopting EFQM included the consolidation of the
new authority, a modernising government, Best Value agenda and efficiency.
The process was started with desk top assessments for most employees
followed by the formation of a Council EFQM Team with trained Assessors
backed up by Lloyd consultants. This was followed by a programme
of Level 2 assessments carried out by trained assessors who spent
a week in each Service interviewing staff at all levels and customers.
The results of the Self Assessment Framework showed that many of
the results were perception based and a lack of time had been allocated
to the results. The final Reports were long and confusing with the
feedback to Management Teams being fraught with problems. The findings
of the Assessor surveys indicated that there was clear leadership
from Senior Management but in the links to Service Plans, whilst
there was clear guidance and framework, there were issues around
the links to final reports and the process of Monitoring Actions
was not clear.
The Long Term Benefits were an 80% take up within Council Services
and from 2001 to 2004 there were increased scores in Policy and
Strategy, partnership and resources, Key Performance Results and
Customer results.
The main conclusions were that Action Planning should be improved
with clear monitoring frameworks established within services. The
assessment process should be improved with more focus on results
which are evidence based. Within Fife Council, the Housing Function
was found to be “ahead of the game” and showed improvement.
If this is due to EFQM, the True Test will be through external regulation
of the Housing Function.
Benchmarking in NHS Scotland
The final presentation was by Scott Walker whose
topic was: Benchmarking in NHS Scotland: Lessons learned from other
NHS, private and public sector organisations. The overall aim was
to understand benchmarking activities undertaken in both the public
and private sectors (NHS procurement organizations and NHSS Health
Boards) and determine how they can be applied to NHS NSS Scottish
Healthcare Supplies. Scott started with the history and background
to benchmarking and indicated that, outwith the manufacturing sector,
benchmarking is carried out in HRM departments, airport authorities,
higher education authorities, National Health Service, Local Government
and the private sector.
A questionnaire was devised using benefits and perceived problems.
The benefits were: defining customer requirements, establishing
effective goals and objectives, being competitive and industry best
practice. The problems were: lack of focus, cost implications and
intellectual law issues. The questionnaires were sent to the three
Nation Organizations (Scotland, Wales and N.I.) ant specific departments
in the 16 Scottish Health Boards: Estates/Facilities, Supplies/Procurement,
Podiatry/ theatre/ Sterile Services and Pharmacy.
Scott had a response rate of 31% and, in NHS Scotland, 32% of respondents
had carried out Benchmarking in the last three years compared with
79% of local government organizations. Scott produced many more
results which can be best condensed and summed up in the Conclusions.
The Conclusions indicated that NHS Home Nation procurement organizations
use Price Benchmarking to demonstrate value for money whereas NHSS
Health Boards use Process Benchmarking to identify options for improvement.
Benchmarking activities being carried out in NHS Scotland are disjointed
across services/health boards. Benchmarking is not a great measure
of customer satisfaction in the public sector.
The Recommendations were that there should be the formation of an
NHS Scotland benchmarking group which should pursue further benchmarking
opportunities with Quality Scotland. It was further recommended
that communications should be developed with local government bodies
to determine possible benchmarking opportunities.
Scott finished his presentation by indicating that an initial meeting
had taken place by the newly formed NHS Scotland Benchmarking Group
which had carried out an independent Benchmarking Pilot in NHS Scotland.
This pilot benchmarked Customer Satisfaction and was pursuing Employee
Satisfaction Benchmarking. A major organizational change is underway
but results on all these are still pending.
Summary
The trio of judges had considered the following
points for the presentations: content, continuity, visual displays,
body language and eye contact by the presenters. Because of the
amount of work which had gone into the presentations, it was decided
to split the book vouchers equally between the presenters. It was
then left to Tom Candlish, Chairman of EoS branch to give the vote
of thanks and finish with a comment which he had overheard that,
“It was wonderful to hear young people talking enthusiastically
about Quality!”
Back to top
|
|
East of Scotland Branch Meeting, Tuesday 15 November 2005, MGt Ltd,
Kirkcaldy
Host: Alistair Booth, Staff Retention and Development Officer.
Subject: Quality in Business Outsourcing Services
It was emphasised from the outset, that MGt are not a tele-sales
call centre but offer service and technical facilities to clients
on an inbound call basis only. Most of their clients are media based
such as Setanta and Top up TV who rely on MGt to facilitate requests
from customers for connection or technical services. They do have
a separate call centre for an insurance group but, again, all calls
are incoming. These are occasioned either by mail shots, TV ads
etc. for new business or existing customers phoning up for information
or to make an insurance claim.
The firm was started by two local businessmen in 1998 and they currently
employ 950 staff in Fife. Great emphasis is placed on staff training
as they employ all the staff and do not use any agency personnel.
Each recruit is allocated to a particular project and is put into
a team with a team leader who trains the group in that particular
client’s business. This results in structured training over
a period of months. They operate from 8am to 4am, obviously using
shift work which seems to suit the wide variety of staff ranging
in age from 16 to 74! They are employing an increasing number of
retired people because they can work for one, two or three days
a week,” which helps with the holidays’ kitty”.
Certainly, most of their employees are in the 18-30 age range and
are recruited through local papers and radio and Careers Offices
in the local Colleges. They design their own software programmes
to suit each client’s needs. However, they have problems getting
software engineers as, even offering very competitive salaries;
they cannot persuade software engineering graduates to commute from
Edinburgh to Kirkcaldy. Their general staff turnover is 7% per month
which compares very favourably with the average call centre.
Customer satisfaction is measured in a number of ways. Incoming
customers can be asked to fill in either an on-line survey form
or answer a few questions at the end of the call. Their clients
can have Customer Managers who oversee a large event such as a football
Cup Final or Old Firm game. This gives them accurate figures on
the number of callers which can be related to marketing and advertising.
To provide the best service, they have an IT control room which
has technicians available during all operating hours. They have
up-to-date protection for power surges and their own back-up generators
for power outages. With a view to future business, they are currently
going for accreditation with the Contact Centre Association (CCA).
As Chairman Tom Candlish said in his summation at the end of the
visit, we learnt a surprising amount about a modern growth service
industry and their efforts to provide a quality service.
|
| East of Scotland Branch Meeting,
Tuesday 18 October 2005, King Malcolm Hotel, Dumfermline.
Speaker, Jayne Day, Service Delivery Manager and
Stuart Barclay, IMS Manager of Alfred McAlpine Business Services.
Subject: Making a difference, tailoring IT services for specific
business needs.
Alfred McAlpine provide services ranging from putting roads into
construction sites to turnkey projects involving the fitting out
and completion of buildings. They have been doing this from 1911
and the one division which has expanded the most recently has been
the Business Service Division.
The Business Service Division provides end-to-end solutions for
IT setups in organizations mainly in the SME sector. McAlpine started
in IT business about 15 years ago and in 2004, the IT Service Management
Division was formed. Jayne, as the Service Delivery Manager indicated
that their primary task is to eliminate the “black hole”
which often exists in projects when trying for completion.
The Division uses the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) version 2
which enables them to map the best practice process. Jayne’s
main topic was how they manage to fill the various “gaps”
which appear from the start of the project to the handover to “live
service”. At the start of a project, it is often apparent
that there is a need for some form of process before any progress
can be made. Jayne has the frequent task of co-ordinating the logistics
of the various IT teams and ensuring that the Project Manager on
each site has an overview of that project. One major area of management
which Jayne found lacking at the beginning of her service was that
billing was not always updated. This area has been tightened up
which obviously aids profitability
There is always a gap during the project life cycle between their
offering a limited warranty and acceptance into service. This is
taken care of by the Service Level Agreement (SLA) which is negotiated
separately for every project as every customer has individual requirements.
To aid the Project team and the customer, McAlpine have a comprehensive
help desk arrangement which satisfies ISO15000..
At the end of the presentation, Chairman Tom Candlish indicated
that it was always a pleasure to hear how people in diverse areas
of operation can overcome problems and pass on their experiences
to an appreciative audience.
Back to top
|
East of Scotland Branch Meeting,
Tuesday 13 September 2005, King Malcolm Hotel, Dumfermline.
Speaker, Nigel Hendry, Quality and Environmental
Manager, Morrison PLC and Property Services Manager, Advansa International
Subject: Comparison of Integrated Management Systems
between a PLC and a SME
Can IMS work for a large international business as well as a SME?
This September meeting welcomed Nigel Hendry who set out to prove
just this. As well as his “day” job as Quality and Environmental
Manager for the large Scottish construction company Morrison, Nigel
also runs a “one-stop” company, Advansa International,
which enables UK residents to easily purchase a plot of land abroad
and have a fully serviced house built on it or purchase a completed
property.
Nigel started by outlining the step-by-step procedures which Morrison
have installed for taking customer requirements through estimating,
construction to handover with post-build maintenance. They are aided
in this by a Material, Plant, and Subcontract Procurement Diagram
which shows all the necessary steps and, more importantly, the necessary
quality checks and signed documentation which are required before
various parts of a project can be signed off and progress made to
the next phase.
Morrison have an overall quality system which starts at the top
with their Policy and then cascades down through the usual Manual,
Procedures, Work Instructions and, finally, Records and References.
Continual Improvement is stressed throughout and Performance Indicators
are used. The main Criterion of the Test and Inspection Procedures
is “Confirming work meets specification” with appropriate
measures for selection of test personnel and non-conformance.
Nigel then contrasted the scale of operations of Morrison with Advansa
and the IMS of the latter. Morrison have over 1000 staff and works
plus sub-contractors whereas Advansa have two. However, Advansa
starts with Customer requirements and a Customer Pre-qualifying
checklist. Nigel was at pains to point out that they had no hesitation
in informing prospective clients if they had insufficient funding
and called a halt there.
Following on from the pre-qualifying, Advansa arranged flights and
hotels for prospective buyers to view locations and property. Once
the customer has made their selection, Advansa use their locally
approved Spanish solicitors for conveyancing and financial dealings.
Advansa also take care of the contracts for after-care maintenance.
If a property is to be built, all matters dealing with land, builders,
suppliers etc is taken care of by selected out-sourcing companies
who have given Advansa satisfactory service over a number of years.
Nigel pointed out that Morrison out-source about 67% and Advansa
about 93% but Advansa still have a similar albeit simpler quality
system like Morrison. The hardest part about out-sourcing is letting
go control to different cultures and philosophies. You become the
customer and you must define your requirements in writing and continually
monitor progress.
Nigel concluded by emphasising the continual improvement message
and the Q&A session was enlivened by discussion on different
interpretations of standards abroad which added to the learning
experience of the evening.
Back to top
|